Feeds:
Posts
Comments
So you have decided to become a landlord! Congratulations! It is an exciting and nerve racking step to take, but well worth it. Before you go off and sign the first tenant that comes through the door, you must make sure you have covered at least these five important pitfalls.
#5 — The Notices

Every state is slightly different, but they all require that a landlord give notice to a tenant for several important events. It is important that you have these notices on hand so that you are not scrambling at the last minute to put them together. Most states require that the landlord provide a notice of late payment and an eviction notice prior to filing a suit to recover your property. You may also be required to provide a notice prior to the end of the lease term if you intend not to renew the lease with the tenant. Finally, you may be required to provide notice if you intend to raise the rents. Make sure you contact an attorney in your area to provide you with a list and maybe templates of the most needed notices.

#4 — The Tenant Application

As a new landlord you are probably anxious to get your first tenant, but how do you know this is the right tenant. To make sure you have the right tenant, create a Tenant Application. The Tenant Application allows you  to gather information about a potential tenant without creating a contractual obligation like a lease. So long as you keep the information private and use it for the purpose of evaluating the tenant, there is no risk to you. Make sure you request financial information, references and background information. Make sure you include authorization to run a background check including a credit report. Consult an attorney in your area to ensure that your application meets the requirements in the law of your state.

#3 — The Walkthrough Addendum

May new landlords are to busy looking for a tenant they forget to protect their new property. Having a walkthrough addendum along with the lease will ensure that you, as a landlord, have a record of the condition of your property prior to leasing it to a tenant. In this manner if there is any dispute as to the condition of the property after the lease term has ended, you have a clear picture of its condition prior to the lease. The walkthrough addendum is a critical portion of the lease and should not be overlooked. You can probably create this on your own, but make sure it covers everything found in the property prior to the signing of the lease agreement. Although not a legal document it can become legally significant in a dispute.

#2 — The Itemized Security Deposit Return Letter

This pitfall may have a long name, but it can cost so much more. Some states require that a landlord itemize how the security deposit was applied to the repairs after a tenant’s lease term has expired and the tenant has moved out. Failure to provide the itemized list could result in a significant fine and/or recoverable damages to the tenant. It is astonishing how many landlords fail to provide this letter. Instead they opt to either use the entire deposit without providing an itemized list risking a lawsuit or return the entire deposit to avoid a lawsuit. So long as you create a list of the repairs that needed to be done to the property to bring it back to a habitable condition and provide that list to the tenant within a reasonable amount of time (sometimes specified by statute), your have covered all your basis. Please consult an attorney in your area to ensure that the itemized list complies with any statutory requirements in your state.

#1 — The Lease Agreement

It is amazing to me how many of the landlord clients I represent fail to have a written lease agreement or have a generic lease agreement from the internet. The lease agreement is the most important document if you are a new landlord. At a minimum, you should have an attorney draft it to ensure that it is tailored to your needs, risk, and property. Leasing a property on a handshake is no longer considered smart, no matter how much you trust the person. The lease agreement is not about trust. It is about protecting your investment and your tenants. If you are a new landlord or thinking of becoming one, make sure you contact an attorney to draft your lease agreement. I can guarantee it will save you money in the end.

A month ago I wrote about a versatile Public Development Financing program, Texas Public Improvement Districts.  In this blog I will discuss the two different types of PIDs allowed under Texas law. Under Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code, the State of Texas allows for the creation of Public Improvement Districts (PID).  As discussed in a earlier blog, PIDs are a flexible way for cities and counties to fund new infrastructure projects, repair existing infrastructure, revitalize an economically depressed area or incentivise industry and commerce to develop or revitalize an area. Chapter 372 contemplates the creation of two types of PIDs — Subchapter A and Subchapter C PIDs. 

Subchapter A Public Improvement Districts

Subchapter A Public Improvement Districts generates the money need for public improvements through assessments.  An assessment is a fee on the property inside the public improvement district used to pay for the improvements built within the district.  The assessment may be apportioned in the following manner:

 

1.      Equally per front foot or square foot;

2.      According to the value of the property as determined by the governing body, with or without regard to improvements on the property; or

3.      In any other manner that results in imposing equal shares of the cost on property similarly benefited.  (Sec.372.015)

 

Subchapter A PIDs can provide all the improvements listed in the previous blog either on a “pay as you go” basis or by issuing “General Obligation and Revenue Bonds”.  Bonds under Subchapter A are secured:

 

1.      Income generated from the improvements financed under Subchapter A

2.      Mortgages or deeds of trust on any real property purchased under Subchapter A or chattel mortgages, liens or security interest on any personal property appurtenant to the real property.

3.      Grants, donations, revenue, or income received or to be received from the government of the United States or any other private or public source

 

An advisory board that develops and recommends an improvement plan to the governing body of the city or county governs Subchapter A PIDs.  The board is advisory in nature and has no additional powers.  The powers rest with the County or City elected officials to the extent that they may disagree with the advisory board.  However, the advisory board must be made up of individuals or their agents who reside or own property within the boundaries of the PID.

 

SubchapterC Public Improvment Districts

 

Subchapter C Public Improvement Districts can only be created by counties and only in counties with a population of 825,000 or more.  The Subchapter C PID was create for one specific project — the San Antonio PGA village, although other developers have requested that Bexar County and San Antonio approve similar Subchapter C PIDs for other areas, no others have been approved.

 

Subchapter C PIDs may be governed by a board of directors appointed by the county and have the powers and duties allowed under the statute.

 

Subchapter C PIDs can provide all the improvements listed in the previous blog either on a “pay as you go” basis or by issuing “Bonds”.  Bonds under Subchapter C are secured:

 

  1. Income generated by assessments
  2. Income generated by any ad valorem, sales and use, or hotel occupancy tax
  3. Special fees, rental, or other revenue sources of the district

 

Subchapter C PID Board of Directors has the powers and duties:

 

1.      County development districts under Chapter 383, except for Section 383.066

2.      Road districts created by a county under Section 52, Article III, Texas Constitutions; and

3.      Municipality or county under Chapter 380 and 381, or under Section 372.003(b)(9)

4.      If consented by the municipality and county by resolution, delegate the powers to the board of road districts and to provide water, wastewater, or drainage facilities

5.      Enter into development agreements

6.      Enter into Economic Development Agreements by election of those in the district

7.      Enter into contracts with any person, including the municipality or county

8.      Create rules of enforcement

a.       To administer and operate the district

b.      For the use, enjoyment, availability, protection, security, and maintenance of district property

c.       To provide for public safety and security

9.      Establish fees for rental of district facilities

10.  Establish rules for use of public roadways, open spaces, parks, sidewalks

11.  Construct roads according to the construction standards, zoning and subdivision requirements of the municipality in whose corporate limits or extraterritorial jurisdiction the district is located.

12.  Provide reimbursement to public utility for relocation, removal, extension, or other adjustment of utilities

13.  District does not have eminent domain powers

14.  District can not enter into tax abatements

15.  With approval of commissioners’ court, a district can issue bonds.  If the population is more that 1000 individuals in the district, bonds must be approved by a majority of the voters.

16.  District can impose

a.       Assessments

b.      Ad valorem tax, only with county approval and majority vote of voters in district

c.       Sales and use tax, only with county approval and majority vote of voters in district

d.      Hotel occupancy tax, only with county approval and majority vote of voters in district

 Subchapter C PIDs are much more extensive and contain a greater number of funding sources for counties.  However, they are currently available to Bexar County.  Hopefully, in the 2009 Legislative Session, legislators from other counties can see the potential to provide economic growth in their communities and extend the use of these Subchapter C PIDs to other counties that can benefit from the available funding source for infrastructure development.

Back on Track

I’ve been on vacation for the last month and have not posted to my blog, but now I am back and eager to get to work.  I hope my readers will come back because there are many topics we can discuss when it comes to development in Texas.  Looking forward to the next couple of months with all of you..

STAY TUNED…..

Public Development Financing is not just a set of tools that communities and developers can use to turn an otherwise undesireable project into a more palpable opportunity. (See ”Making Lemons Into Lemonade“, June 25, 2008)  Public Development Financing can also be a valuable tool for communities in creating the necessary environment to foster economic development and economic growth.  Cities and counties often need to make certain improvements to their infrastructure to facilitate economic growth within an area. New companies may choose not to locate in or relocate to communities that have inadequate streets, substandard utility services, or other inferior public facilities or services. It is also difficult for existing businesses in a community to prosper in areas that have poor public infrastructure and services.

Fortunately, Texas law provides a number of ways to finance needed public improvements.  Traditionally, Texas communities use their existing tax base, either ad valorem taxes or sales taxes, as collateral for municipal bonds sold in the open market to generate capital for public improvement projects (i.e. building of streets, sidewalks, parks, fire stations, libraries, etc.)  However, in many communities the traditional way of generating capital for public improvements may not be enough to accomodate all the public infrastructure needs of a community.  Instead communities are left to make difficult decisions regarding the needs of their citizens.  It is even more difficult to generate enough capital for improvements in rural or urban communities with a small or diminishing tax base.  There are, however, several solutions available through Public Development Financing that can help generate the necessary capital for needed public infrastructure improvements.  In this three part series, we will examine one rarely used Public Development Financing mechanism that can benefit communties, developers and business owners alike by supplying the necessary capital for public infrastructure improvements without using the existing tax base.

Public Improvement Districts (PIDs) offer cities and counties an alternative means for undertaking public improvement projects needed for economic growth.  The Public Improvement District Assessment Act allows any city to levy and collect special assessments on property in a desiganted Public Improvement District created within the city limits or within the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ). Further, counties may levy and collect special assessments on property located in a PID created within the county’s juristictional area, unless within 30 days of a county’s action to approve the public improvement district, a home rule city objects to the establishment of the PID, but only if the PID is located within the objecting home rule city’s corporate limits or ETJ.  The statute authorizing the creation of PIDs is found in Chapter 372 of the Texas Local Government Code.

Public improvement districts may be formed to accomplish any of the following improvements: 

  • water, wastewater, health and sanitation, or drainage improvements (including acquisition, construction, or improvements of water, wastewater or drainage improvements);
  • street and sidewalk improvements (acquiring, constructing, improving, widening, narrowing, closing or rerouting sidewalks, streets or any other roadways or their rights-of-way);
  • mass transit improvements (acquisition, construction, improvement or rerouting of mass transportation facilities);
  • parking improvements (acquisition, construction or improvement of off-street parking facilities);
  • library improvements (acquisition, construction or improvement of libraries);
  • park, recreation and cultural improvements (the establishment or improvement of parks);
  • landscaping and other aesthetic improvements (erection of fountains, distinctive lighting and signs);
  • art installation (acquisition and installation of pieces of art);
  • creation of pedestrian malls (construction or improvement of pedestrian malls);
  • similar improvements (projects similar to those listed above);
  • supplemental safety services for the improvement of the district, including public safety and security services; or
  • supplemental business-related services for the improvement of the district, including advertising and business recruitment and development. 

The creation of Public Improvement Districts allow communities to designate areas in need of public infrastructure improvements and levy an assessment on only those benefiting from the public improvements without having to tap into the existing tax base of the entire community.  Chapter 372 provides for two types of public improvement districts.  In our next post, we will discuss the similarities, differences, advantages and disadvantages of these two types of public improvement districts.  Our final post on this topic, discusses the best practices to use in the creation of a public improvement district and how communities, developers and businesses can achieve the greatest benefit from this type of Public Development Financing mechanism.  Stay tuned…

  

          On Friday June 27, 2008, the City of San Antonio and Bexar County got a jolt of reality, AT&T Corporation; by far the most lucrative Fortune 100 Company in San Antonio was moving its headquarters to Dallas. (See City officials surprised by announcement of the corporate departure San Antonio Express News, Lack of direct air connections cited as key reason for decision San Antonio Express News and AT&T to relocate headquarters; most jobs staying San Antonio Express News)  Citing the lack of direct flights from San Antonio International Airport, AT&T Chairman and CEO, Randall Stephenson, broke the news by telephone on Friday to County Judge Nelson Wolff and Mayor Phil Hardberger.  Two days before, Wolff and Hardberger had met with Stephenson, who made no mention of the move, reported the San Antonio Express News.  Still shell shocked from the blow, political, business and community leaders vowed that AT&T moving was not as bad as reported.  They cited the 5000 jobs AT&T would still have in San Antonio and the number of new corporations wanting to locate to the city.

             Most articles I have read are still asking why political and business leaders were caught of guard with this news or what lessons can be learned from this experience.  (See Jaime Castillo: There is much to be learned in the wake of AT&T’s departure
San Antonio Express News) However, I must say that AT&T leaving for “better pastures” (/sarcasm) is not surprising.  It should not come as a shock to anyone, especially, when AT&T (then Southwestern Bell) pulled the same stunt on St. Louis in 1992.  Dallas mayor, Tom Leppert has been courting AT&T behind San Antonio’s back for a year? What is that saying, “Once a cheater, always a cheater.”

             The true lesson that every community must take from AT&T’s “out of the blue” departure is that the best medicine against these types of events is to “Grow Your Own!“  One thing my years as an economic developer and now as an economic development lawyer have taught me is that locally owned companies do not leave their home towns, unless you ignore them.  San Antonio has done a great job of ignoring local businesses in their attempt to grow their economy. Political and business leaders have forgotten that 80 to 90 percent of the San Antonio economy is locally owned businesses.  Instead they have given millions of dollars in incentives to major companies (i.e. Toyota, Microsoft, Washington Mutual, AT&T, etc.) who choose to relocate or locate in San Antonio.  Don’t get me wrong; in order to compete in the global economy San Antonio must make economic development incentives available to the multinational corporations, but here is a novel idea, how about growing San Antonio’s own multinational corporations.

             There are hundreds of locally owned businesses that have the potential and capacity to become multinational corporations headquartered in San Antonio.  These companies have every reason to stay and grow in San Antonio because they have a stake in our community. San Antonio is home to them.  Toyota, AT&T, Microsoft and other companies who relocate have nothing to loose if they leave, because this is not home.  Locally owned businesses have everything to loose and nothing to gain by leaving.  Hopefully, one day we can say that ABC Corporation’s main headquarters is still in San Antonio, with offices all over the world. 

            However, for this prophecy to come true San Antonio’s political and business leaders must shift their focus from attracting big companies to San Antonio, to growing big companies in San Antonio.  If they took just 50 percent of the tax abatement, economic development and incentive dollars that San Antonio flaunts in front of out-of-town corporations and flaunt them in front of locally owned businesses, San Antonio will make up the 700 executive jobs lost to Dallas and attract thousands more jobs to San Antonio. San Antonio must make it easier for locally owned businesses to benefit from the many economic development incentives available through the city and county offices.  Moreover, it is a lesson for every Texas community.  Look for the next multinational, national, state, or regional corporation within your community and help them achieve their goals.  They will always be loyal to your community and you will never have to be shocked by a last minute announcement.

Making Lemons Into LemonadeThere are a number of tools available to developers and communities through the city, county and state governments that will turn a development venture that is considered a lemon into lemonade.  The past ventures you turned down or turned away because you were sure they were lemons now deserve a second look.  However, look at them in a new light, using Public Development Financing as a tool.

 

Communities today are competing in a global economy.  No longer is their greatest competitor the neighboring municipality, instead it’s the municipality in India, China, Mexico or Indonesia and may other places around the world.  Consequently, many municipalities are looking for ways to attract or keep existing developments within their city limits.  Developers and Communities can establish a partnership that can turn impractical ventures into competitive opportunities.

 

Public Development Financing is the use of unrealized public dollars to finance private development projects through public-private partnerships.  This type of financing is nothing new, however, may smaller communities have not taken advantage of the tools available to them and many developers are not aware of the opportunities for this type of financing in smaller communities.

 

For example, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) has been a local tool for development in the State of Texas since the late 1970’s.  However, not until recently, have communities with populations under 100,000 used this tool to attract new development.  Still many communities are unaware of the benefits of Tax Increment Financing to attract new development ventures.

 

For a small community, Tax Increment Financing creates new infrastructure and development without having to use any existing general fund money.  Instead, the community uses the developer’s money to fund projects that otherwise would not be viable or would have taken years to complete.  The TIF projects spur growth in the community, attract industry, encourage entrepreneurship, provide quality housing or improve quality of life.  Through TIF, the community creates incentives for development, while improving the lives of their residents.

 

For a developer, Tax Increment Financing is a project saver because it can take an otherwise unprofitable project and make it a viable venture.  Many times what makes a venture unprofitable is securing reasonable financing for a project.  Developers can use reimbursements from TIF incentives to secure conventional financing for a development project at a much more reasonable rate.  Because of TIF, developers can take a look at smaller communities as viable places to locate their projects.

 

Like Tax Increment Financing, there are a number of local, county and state tools that developers and communities can use to create public-private partnerships to generate opportunities for development to benefit residents. 

 

Avoiding Construction Defect ClaimsIntroduction

 

             The mortgage crisis continues to affect homeowners’ ability to make their payments.  Over the last several months, mortgage foreclosures (particularly, sub-prime mortgage foreclosures) are on an unprecedented climb. Homeowners in danger of loosing their homes are trying to find avenues to stop foreclosures.  In an effort to stop lenders from foreclosing, homeowners are becoming creative.   

          In desperation, homeowners’ creativity has led them to claim they discovered multiple defects with their homes.  The lure of “easy money” tempts the homeowner to file claims against the builder seeking a monetary settlement from the builder’s insurance or the builder. The target of these construction defect claims are often small and medium size residential builders.

            Small and medium size residential builders are often not equipped to defend construction defect claims making them vulnerable to these types of claims.  Many builders do not have the mechanisms or processes in place to prevent, deter or effectively defend a construction defect claim. Consequently, builders, particularly small and medium size, fail to effectively defend against homeowners who claim defective workmanship in their home.

           This guide, although not comprehensive, introduces five steps residential builders should act upon to more effectively prevent, deter and/or defend against construction defect claims by homeowners. Although no set of tips guarantees complete success, these five steps go a long way towards protecting builders against construction defect claims from homeowners.  Moreover, these five steps give builders an advantage in the event a homeowner files a claim.

 One — Register with the Texas Residential Construction Commission

            In 2003, the Legislature adopted the Texas Residential Construction Commission Act (TRCCA).  TRCCA created an alternative mechanism for residential builders and their customers to solve disputes arising out of construction defects.[1]  As a residential builder, the most important protection against defect claims filed by homeowners is to register with the Texas Residential Construction Commission (TRCC).  A builder’s TRCC certificate of registration is the first line of defense against construction defect claims.

             Under the TRCCA, no claim for damages arising out of a construction defect may be filed in Court against a builder until the homeowner has submitted the claim to the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process (SIRP).[2]  The greatest advantage residential builders currently have against construction defect claims is SIRP.  SIRP is an effective mechanism because 1) the State is a third party inspector, eliminating bias; 2) TRCCA allows the builder to cure any defects found by the state inspector in lieu of monetary compensation; and 3) if a homeowner is not satisfied with SIRP and files a claim in Court, the homeowner must overcome the presumption of the existence or nonexistence of a construction defect established by the SIRP recommendation or ruling by a preponderance of the evidence and must establish that the recommendation or ruling is inconsistent with applicable warranty and building and performance standards.[3]  The unbiased nature of the process, the ability to cure any defects and the need to overcome the presumption deters homeowners seeking monetary compensation from filing frivolous claims of defects against builders.

           However, a builder cannot is not protected by the process if the builder was not registered at the time the builder and homeowner entered into the contract, or if the certificate of registration of the builder was revoked.[4]  Consequently, in order to ensure a first line of defense against construction defect claim, builders must register with TRCC.Your First Line of Defense

 

  Two – Customer Service

             In any industry Customer Service is the key to increased sales and customer satisfaction.  The residential construction industry is no different.  A residential builder with extraordinary customer relations is a successful builder. 

             However, Customer Service is also a key to avoiding construction defect claims.  Builders who cultivate longstanding relationships with their homeowners through customer service throughout the building process can rely on that relationship to prevent claims of construction defect.  A builder with established customer relationships is more likely to here from a homeowner about a potential defect prior to a homeowner filing a complaint with TRCC or filing a claim in Court. 

 Builders with excellent customer service relationships address potential construction issues with their customers during the project making it less likely to face a defect claim two or three years down the road.  Even so, maintaining that customer service relationship through the entire warranty period and in some cases beyond can go a long way towards avoiding construction defect claims.

 Excellent customer service is no guarantee that a claim will not be filed, but it can make a builder aware of potential issues and probably avoid a claim.

 Three – Everything in Writing

              One thing a good lawyer learns is that everything should be in writing.  There is a saying in Mexico “la mas palida tinta es mas fuerte que cualquier palabra“, loosely translated it means “even the most faded writing is more powerful than any spoke word.”

              As a residential builder the worst thing to do is to leave your business open to potential litigation.  From the subcontractors to customers, as a builder it is very important to create a paper trail to protect business interests.  If TRCC is the first line of defense against potential claims, a well documented paper trail is the reinforcements.

            Subcontractor agreements, inspection documents, construction plans, engineering reports, soil reports, warranty documents, homeowner inspection reports, sales documents, repair requests, etc. are important documents needed to defend against a SIRP or a lawsuit.  The strength of any defense is only a solid as the quality of the reinforcements.  The more extensive and rigorous the paper trail that is created, the more likely a builder can avoid construction defect claims.

             A homeowner that elects to continue a construction defect claim after the SIRP must overcome the rebuttable presumption of the third party inspector or panel report.[5]  A thorough and comprehensive paper trail can reinforce the inspector or panel’s report making more difficult for the homeowner to overcome presumption.  No document or report is the “Holy Grail”, however, collectively, contracts, inspection reports, signed approvals, signed warranties, signed repair requests, etc. can become the reinforcements needed to bolster a defense during SIRP or litigation.

 Four – Create a Process

             If TRCC is the first line of defense and a thorough paper trail is the reinforcements, the processes established by the company prior to, during and after construction of a residence is the preemptive strike.  Residential builder should establish a process that covers the preconstruction, construction and post-construction phase.  Processes create business efficiencies.  More importantly, processes create the paper trail needed as reinforcement during a construction defect claim.

             Processes that involve the homeowner and require the customer to sign, inspect and sign off on certain phases of the work can be very beneficial to the residential builder.  Processes during the construction phase that establish homeowner and third party inspection points at crucial construction junctions will go a long way towards avoiding construction defect claims.  During the first year after a sale of a home, repair and replacement processes that involve: 1) call intake and documentation; 2) job assignment and scheduling; 3) prompt repair and replacement (i.e. response time); 4) homeowner sign off on the work; and 5) builder re-inspection.

             Most construction defect claims stem from a builder’s lack of response to customer requests for repairs.  Processes like the one described above will ensure that a customer requests are addressed promptly.  More importantly, the process creates a paper trail supporting the builder’s diligence in addressing any customer requests.

 Five – Know the Law

             Residential builder’s efforts are focused on the business.  However, it is important to become familiar with the TRCC and SIRP.  A builder should at a minimum, understand the function of TRCC, the state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process and the minimum warranties.

             TRCC is an unbiased arbiter between a customer and the builder.  TRCC’s function is to ensure that costly litigation is avoided in favor of a builder making the necessary repairs requested by a customer.  The majority of customers want their homes repaired rather than having to file a lawsuit.  The majority of builders want to satisfy their customers in order to receive repeat business.  TRCC helps accomplish this through their inspection and dispute resolution process.

             The state-sponsored inspection and dispute resolution process is three easy steps.  1) A customer makes a complaint which TRCC evaluates and either rejects or accepts; 2) If it accepts the complaint, it sends a state-inspector to inspect the property based on the complaint and the inspector files a report; and 3) based on that report a builder is give the opportunity to repair and the state to re-inspect.  Of course, this is a simplified version; the TRCC website can give you a more detailed overview of the process.

             The legislature has set minimum warranty standards for residential construction.  A homeowner is entitled to at a minimum: 1) one year warranty on workmanship and materials; 2) two years on plumbing, electrical, heating and air-conditioning delivery systems; and 3) ten years for major structural components of the home.[6]  A builder and customer can contractually create more stringent warranties, but the statutory warranties cannot be waived.[7]  Therefore, a residential builder who is aware of these minimums can establish alerts that signal when the warranty period ends for the benefit of both the customer and the builder. 

             Having a working knowledge of the law can help a builder make the correct decisions prior to a customer filing a construction defect claim.  A few minutes registering with TRCC, focusing on customer services, creating a thorough paper trail, developing pre-construction construction and post-construction processes, and reviewing the TRCC website can save residential builders thousands of dollars in litigation costs.        

 


 

[1] Section 426.001 (a)(1) Vernon’s Texas Statutes Annotated

[2] Section 426.005 (a) Vernon’s Texas Statutes Annotated

[3] Section 426.008 (a) Vernon’s Texas Statutes Annotated

[4] Section 426.005 (f)(1-2) Vernon’s Texas Statutes Annotated

[5] Section 426.008 (a) Vernon’s Texas Statutes Annotated

[6] Section 430.001(b) Vernon’s State Statutes Annotated

[7] Section 430.007 Vernon’s State Statutes Annotated

 

 

 

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.